May 10, 2017

The Chief Compliance Officer serves an important role in an investment adviser firm’s business. A role that requires expertise, independent judgment, and dedication, an increasing number of investment adviser firms are choosing to outsource the Chief Compliance Officer position to third party compliance professionals. Despite the potential cost-savings, outsourcing this vital role is generally not a wise business strategy and will likely increase the firm’s risk of exam by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or affect the depth of inquiry an investment adviser firm is subject to once an exam has begun.

Continue Reading

Wyoming Investment Adviser Registration Requirements

May 09, 2017

As of July 1, 2017 the State of Wyoming will require investment advisers to register with Wyoming securities regulators if the investment adviser has less than $100 million of assets under management (AUM) unless it meets another criteria for registering with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Wyoming had been the only state that did not regulate investment advisers.

Continue Reading

Colorado Proposes Cybersecurity Rule for Investment Adviser Firms

April 21, 2017

The Colorado Division of Securities recently proposed two new rules that would require investment adviser firms and broker-dealers to assess cybersecurity risks and implement written policies and procedures “reasonably designed to ensure cybersecurity.” Click here to read the Rulemaking Notice. Given the sensitive and confidential nature of their work, cybersecurity is an important and evolving concern for investment adviser firms.

Continue Reading

DoL Fiduciary Rule Delayed 60 Days

April 07, 2017

Today, the Department of Labor (DoL) published a rule delay for the fiduciary rule, delaying its applicability date by 60 days. The initial applicability date of the fiduciary rule was April 10, 2017.  The 60 day delay moves the applicability date to June 9, 2017.  This action also extends (for 60 days) the applicability dates of the Best Interest Contract Exemption and the Class Exemption for Principal Transactions in Certain Assets Between Investment Advice Fiduciaries and Employee Benefit Plans and IRAs.

Continue Reading

SEC Enforcement Action: Investment Adviser Fails to Disclose Affiliate Broker-Dealer Conflicts of Interest

March 14, 2017

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued an enforcement action recently against an investment adviser firm for its alleged failure to disclose fee sharing arrangements that the investment adviser firm entered with its third-party broker dealer. The investment adviser firm consented to the order without admitting or denying the SEC findings, except as specified within the SEC’s Order. Click here to read the full SEC Order Instituting Administrative and Cease-And-Desist Proceedings.

Continue Reading

Inadvertent Custody – SEC Guidance Update

March 07, 2017

In February 2017,  the Division of Investment Management of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued a Guidance Update “Inadvertent Custody: Advisory Contract Versus Custodial Contract Authority.” In this Guidance Update, the SEC explained that an investment adviser may have custody of client funds or securities because of provisions in a custodial agreement entered into by the investment advisory client and a qualified custodian.

Continue Reading

SEC Guidance: Robo-Advisers and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940

February 27, 2017

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) recently issued new guidance for investment adviser firms and individual investors considering the use of robo-advisers. Robo-advisers are becoming increasingly popular among investment adviser firms and clients alike, due to their ability to provide targeted investment advice for a lower investment advisory fee, which increases the accessibility of professional investment advice for frugal investors or investors whose account balances may not meet an investment adviser firm’s required minimum account balance. Robo-advisers are not suitable for every client, however, leading the SEC to issue guidance for investment adviser firms seeking to utilize this new technology.

Continue Reading

SEC Enforcement Action – ETFs and Failure to Follow Policies and Procedures

February 15, 2017

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a press release announcing that an investment adviser, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, agreed to pay an $8 million penalty to settle charges under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 relating to single inverse ETF investments it had recommended to investment advisory clients. Click here to for the entire press release and here for the SEC’s order.

Continue Reading