Navigating the Regulatory Maze for Registered Investment Advisors

noreply@blogger.com (bhill) — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:39:00 +0000

Yesterday, the Division of Investment Management of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") updated its Staff Responses to Questions About the Custody Rule. In the updated responses, the Division provided guidance for co-trustee arrangements. As a result of the new guidance, we have revised our Investment Adviser Compliance Alert published yesterday. For an updated version, please click here.

For your easy reference, the following are the specific changes that have been made to pages 3 and 4 of this Investment Adviser Compliance Alert:SEC Adopts to Custody Rule under Investment Advisers Act of 1940:

Serving as Trustee is Deemed to be Custody

If an investment adviser or its related persons serve as trustee, executor to an estate or conservator, that will cause the investment adviser to have custody. If a supervised person has any capacity that gives the supervised person legal ownership of, or access to, the client funds, then the investment adviser is deemed to have custody. The current rule provides no exception for the investment adviser or its related persons acting as a co-trustee. However, on March 10, 2010, the SEC's Division of Investment Management provided the following guidance regarding co-trustee arrangements.

Q: In some trusts, co-trustees are required either by law or the trust instrument in order to protect the trust beneficiaries from the actions of a single trustee acting alone. In these situations, no co-trustee is able to withdraw assets without the prior written consent of the other co-trustee(s). Would an adviser acting as trustee in this type of arrangement have custody of the trust's assets for purposes of the rule?

A: The Division would not consider an adviser to have custody in such circumstances, provided that (i) the trust has a co-trustee that is a bank or a trust company that meets the definition of a qualified custodian under rule 206(4)-2(d)(6) and is not a related person of the adviser, (ii) the qualified custodian delivers account statements directly to each co-trustee that is not itself the custodian, and (iii) under the trust instrument or by law the withdrawal of any assets of the trust by the adviser requires the prior written consent of all of its co-trustee(s). (Posted March 10, 2010.)

Q: For estate planning and other purposes, some people form revocable grantor trusts. With these trusts, the person who establishes and funds the trusts (the grantor) may revoke or modify the trust at will, including changing beneficiaries. If an adviser is co-trustee along with the grantor, would the adviser have custody of the trust's assets for purposes of the rule?

A: The Division would not consider an adviser to have custody under rule 206(4)-2 in such circumstances if (i) the adviser is prohibited by the trust instrument or by law from withdrawing any assets from the trust without the prior written consent of all of its co-trustees, (ii) each grantor who has contributed assets to the trust acts as co-trustee, and (iii) the qualified custodian delivers account statements directly to each co-trustee. (Posted March 10, 2010.)

See: http://www.sec.gov/divisions/investment/custody_faq_030510.htm

Our Complimentary White Paper About the SEC's New Custody Rule for Investment Advisers Is Now Available

noreply@blogger.com (bhill) — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:03:00 +0000

Due to overwhelming number of questions and apparent confusion among many federally registered investment advisers, we've prepared a complimentary white paper exploring the new custody rule of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). This white paper provides details regarding the definition of custody, examples of custody and requirements under the new SEC rule. To obtain a copy of our white paper, please click here.

We are also encouraging chief compliance officers of investment adviser firms to review the SEC's recently updated set of frequently asked questions related to the SEC's new custody rule. Prior to the recent update on March 5, 2010, the SEC's Division of Investment Management last updated the FAQs in 2005. In order to review the updated FAQs, please click here.

Finally, you can learn more about the SEC's new custody rule, best practices for complying with the rule and ways to avoid being deemed to have custody by attending our webinar on Thursday, March 25 at 12:00 p.m. Central. This webinar will focus specifically on how the rule applies to pooled invest vehicles and investment advisers operating a qualified custodian or broker-dealer.

Effective Date for SEC's New Custody Rule Is Less than 4 Weeks Away

noreply@blogger.com (bhill) — Sun, 14 Feb 2010 17:03:00 +0000

Is your federally registered investment adviser firm ready for the SEC's new custody rule?

Join us Thursday, February 25, 2010 for our webinar exploring the new SEC requirements for investment adviser firms with custody. We will be discussing many common investment adviser practices that result in custody as defined by the SEC and answer pressing questions about the rules impact on investment advisers. The focus of the February 25th webinar will be on the deduction of advisory fees, acceptance of third-party checks from clients, trustee relationships, and other common custody situations for investment adviser firms.

On Thursday, March 25, 2010, we will be holding a second webinar devoted to the SEC's new custody rule. The focus of the March 25th webinar will be on investment adviser firms that are or have affiliated qualified custodians and investment adviser firms that own or operate pooled investment vehicles such as hedge funds, private real estate deals and other private placement securities.

Late last year, the SEC passed changes to Rule 206(4)-2 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The definition of custody did not materially change. In fact the only real change is that the new definition clearly covers custody by a related person of the investment adviser. According to the SEC rule, custody means "holding, directly or indirectly, client funds or securities, or having any authority to obtain possession of them. You have custody if a related person holds, directly or indirectly, client funds or securities, or has any authority to obtain possession of them, in connection with advisory services you provide to clients. As defined under the rule, custody includes the following:

(i) Possession of client funds or securities (but not of checks drawn by clients and made payable to third parties) unless you receive them inadvertently and you return them to the sender promptly but in any case within three business days of receiving them;

(ii) Any arrangement (including a general power of attorney) under which you are authorized or permitted to withdraw client funds or securities maintained with a custodian upon your instruction to the custodian; and

(iii) Any capacity (such as general partner of a limited partnership, managing member of a limited liability company or a comparable position for another type of pooled investment vehicle, or trustee of a trust) that gives you or your supervised person legal ownership of or access to client funds or securities.

Investment advisers with custody must continue to make sure that all client funds and securities are held with a qualified custodian and make sure clients are given notice of the qualified custodian's name, address, and manner in which the funds and securities are maintained. The new rule requires that client's receive an account statement directly from the qualified custodian at least quarterly. Investment advisers must establish a reasonably believe, after due inquiry, that all clients are receiving account statements directly from the qualified custodian. Investment advisers may continue to send their own statements to clients so long as the statements include a legend in the statement urging clients to compare the statements they receive from the qualified custodian with those they receive from the investment adviser.

In addition to these requirements, investment advisers must hire an independent accounting firm to perform an annual surprise examination verifying the location of client funds and securities. To the relief of many investment advisers, the SEC was persuaded that the surprise verification examination will not provide materially greater protection to advisory clients when the investment adviser has custody of client assets solely because of its authority to deduct advisory fees from client accounts. Therefore, while fee deduction authority is custody, it has been exempted from the surprise examination requirement.

Investments advisers that act as the qualified custodian and investment advisers that use a related person qualified custodian will be subject to an annual internal control report. The internal control report must include an opinion of an independent public accountant as to whether controls have been placed in operation as of a specific date, and are suitably designed and are operating effectively to meet control objectives relating to custodial services, including the safeguarding of funds and securities held by either the investment adviser or the related person on behalf of clients, during the year. The independent public accountant must verify that the funds and securities are reconciled to a custodian other than the investment adviser or related person. Finally, the independent public accountant must be registered with, and subject to regular inspection as of the commencement of the professional engagement period, and as of each calendar year-end, by, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in accordance with its rules.

To hear more about the new custody rule, best practices for complying with the rule and ways to avoid being deemed to have custody, join us for our February 25th and March 25th webinars.

Deadline Approaching for Filing the Form 13F with the SEC

noreply@blogger.com (bhill) — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 19:31:00 +0000

Is your investment advisor firm required to file quarterly the Form 13F with the SEC?

According to Section 13(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, an institutional money manager that exercises investment discretion over $100 million of Section 13(f) securities must submit quarterly 13F reports to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Since a registered investment advisor firm meets the definition of an institutional money manager, it is subject to this rule when the investment advisor firm exercises investment discretion over $100 million of Section 13(f) securities.

An investment advisor firm that does not currently submit Form 13F reports with the SEC needs to verify that it did not exceed the 13(f) discretion threshold of $100 million at any time during calendar year 2009. To the extent your investment advisor firm exceeded $100 million of Section 13(f) securities any time during 2009, your investment advisor firm will need to file its first Form 13F by February 15, 2010. The Form 13F must report ending values as of December 31, 2009. Your investment advisor firm will then need to submit filings for quarters ending March, June, and September 2010, even if the market value of your Section 13(f) securities falls below the $100 million level.

Finally, current Form 13F filers that exceeded $100 million of discretionary 13(f) securities on the last trading day of at least one month during the year 2009 must also submit their fourth quarter 2009 reports by February 15, 2010.

Does your Investment Adviser Have Effective Procedures to Monitor and Approve Performance Advertisements?

noreply@blogger.com (bhill) — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:01:00 +0000

Advertising continues to be one of the primary focus areas of the SEC during investment adviser examinations. More specifically, performance advertising is one of the more common deficiencies found during SEC examinations and one that needs effective compliance oversight. During examinations, the SEC is interested in whether investment advisers have effective policies and procedures to make sure that their claims about past investment performance, their advertisements, and other marketing materials, among other things, contain accurate information, are not misleading, are not promissory, and have been reviewed by compliance.

Unfortunately, SEC Rule 206(4)-1 (Advertisements by Investment Advisers) under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 provides little guidance on performance advertising. Much of the SEC's guidance is spelled out in no-action letters, with probably the most important one being Clover Capital Management, Inc., and enforcement actions. Investment advisers that regularly advertise performance need be familiar with the parameters outlined in Clover. The importance of Clover is heightened by the fact that the SEC staff, as a matter of policy, does not review specific advertisements except when conducting an examination of an investment adviser.

The following is a general summary of proper performance advertising compliance outlined by the SEC’s Division of Investment Management and Office of Compliance.

The SEC staff has said that, if you advertise your past investment performance record, you should disclose all material facts necessary to avoid any unwarranted inference. For example, SEC staff has indicated that it may view performance data to be misleading if it:

· does not disclose prominently that the results portrayed relate only to a select group of the adviser’s clients, the basis on which the selection was made, and the effect of this practice on the results portrayed, if material;

· does not disclose the effect of material market or economic conditions on the results portrayed (e.g., an advertisement stating that the accounts of the adviser’s clients appreciated in value 25% without disclosing that the market generally appreciated 40% during the same period);

· does not reflect the deduction of advisory fees, brokerage or other commissions, and any other expenses that accounts would have or actually paid;

· does not disclose whether and to what extent the results portrayed reflect the reinvestment of dividends and other earnings;

· suggests or makes claims about the potential for profit without also disclosing the possibility of loss;

· compares model or actual results to an index without disclosing all material facts relevant to the comparison (e.g., an advertisement that compares model results to an index without disclosing that the volatility of the index is materially different from that of the model portfolio); and

· does not disclose any material conditions, objectives, or investment strategies used to obtain the results portrayed (e.g., the model portfolio contains equity stocks that are managed with a view towards capital appreciation).

If your investment adviser utilizes performance advertising, you should attend our webinar, “Approving Performance Advertising,” on Wednesday, January 27, 2010 from 12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. CST to learn more about developing strong compliance policies and procedures for preparing, approving and maintaining records related to performance advertising. During this webinar, our consultants will examine the SEC's advertising rule, the SEC no-actions concerning performance advertising and related SEC enforcement actions. RIA Compliance Consultants will provide best practices and disclosures for investment advisers utilizing performance advertising.

Did your Firm Renew for 2010? Don't Forget About Form ADV Annual Amendments

noreply@blogger.com (bhill) — Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:35:00 +0000

Now that we are into a new year, can you confirm your registered investment advisor and its advisor representatives were properly renewed for 2010? Every year there are always a handful of firms that fail to submit renewal fees through the IARD system in a timely fashion. Therefore, even if you think the renewal payment was sent in time, please make sure your firm retrieves the Final Renewal Statement and confirms it is renewed for calendar year 2010.

The Final Renewal Statement will indicate one of the following.

Paid in Full - If your firm's renewal statement has been paid in full, the renewal process is complete. You should print a copy of the Final Renewal Statement and file it with your firm's books and records.

Outstanding Balance Due or Refund - If your firm paid its Preliminary Renewal Statement in full, but added or removed a state registration or advisor representative during the time period between the posting of Preliminary Renewal Statements and the 2009 shut down period, then your firm will either have additional fees due or receive a credit. If additional fees are due, the fees should be submitted as soon as possible, but must be posted by February 5, 2010. If your firm received a refund, the credit will automatically be transferred to your firm's Daily Account.

Failed to Renew - If a firm's Final Renewal Statement indicates Failed to Renew, FINRA did not receive the total balance due on the Preliminary Renewal Statement prior to the December deadline. In these cases, it is standard operating procedure for FINRA to automatically terminate all advisor representatives of the firm. In addition, over thirty states have given FINRA the authority to automatically terminate a registered investment advisor that does not pay its renewal fees in full. If your firm's statement indicates Failed to Renew, you will need to contact each state jurisdiction immediately to determine an appropriate course of action.

It is important to make sure your registered investment advisor submits all required documentation directly to the states where the firm is registered. If your firm failed to renew through IARD, it is important to take immediate action to rectify the situation. Give us a call to find out more about our re- registration services and pricing.

In addition to confirming your firm's registration renewal for 2010, we would like to remind registered investment advisors of their responsibility to prepare and file their Form ADV Part 1 Annual Amendment. The Annual Amendment must be filed no later than 90 days after a registered investment advisor firm's fiscal year ends. Many registered investment advisors use December 31 as their fiscal year end which results in a March 30, 2010 deadline to submit the Annual Amendment through the IARD system. The Annual Amendment is used to update information such as number of clients, number of accounts, and assets under management. We recommend registered investment advisors closely review the entire Form ADV to confirm all information is correct.

SEC registered firms should be aware that the SEC and FINRA have reinstated the annual IARD Firm System Processing Fee. The fee is assessed for the electronic filing of forms on the IARD system. The IARD Firm System Processing Fee is separate from applicable state Notice Filing fees. It must be paid by SEC registered firm when filing the Annual Amendment. Firms can begin working on the Annual Amendment, but will need to fund their IARD Daily Account before they can submit the Annual Amendment.

Please refer to the following schedule to determine your firm's annual fee and submit payment to your firm's IARD Daily Account. Be sure to fund the Daily Account; do not fund the Renewal Account: (a) for assets under management of less than $25 million, there's a fee of $40; (b) for assets under management between $25 million and $100 million, there's a fee of $150; and (c) for assets under management over $100 million, there's a fee of $200.

Please contact RIA Compliance Consultants, Inc. if you are interested in our Form ADV Annual Amendment services. We would also like to invite you to attend our upcoming webinar on January 14, "Preparing the Form ADV Part 1 Annual Amendment". The registration fee for our webinar is $59.95. During this webinar, RIA Compliance Consultants will discuss the items that must be updated as part of the Form ADV Part 1 Annual Amendment including how securities regulators expect a registered investment advisor to calculate assets under management. In addition, we will review common mistakes when preparing the Form ADV Part 1 Annual Amendment. Finally, we will cover some common examples of material changes that should have been updated to your Form ADV during the past year.

Recent Changes Regarding the Series 65 and Series 66 Examinations

noreply@blogger.com (bhill) — Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:29:00 +0000

Effective January 1, 2010, the North American Securities Administrators Association ("NASAA") has made some changes regarding the composition and the minimum passing score for the Series 65 and Series 66 Examinations.

The Series 65 is the Uniform Investment Adviser Law Examination, which is designed to qualify candidates as investment adviser representatives. The Series 65 Examination will continue to be comprised of 130 questions; however, effective January 1, 2010, the number of questions devoted to Legal and Regulatory Issues will decrease from 45 to 40 and the remaining 90 questions will cover Economic Concepts, including investment products, recommendations, and strategies and may include a few questions on Capital Markets Theory and specific types of accounts, such as College Savings Plans. Additionally, the Examination includes 10 questions which are considered pretest questions, which do not count towards the final grade. Effective January 1, 2010, the passing grade for the Series 65 Examination was increased from 68.5% to 72%.

The Series 66 is the Uniform Combined State Law Examination, which is designed to qualify candidates both as securities agents and investment adviser representatives. The Series 7 is considered a corequisite exam to the Series 66 and is required to be successfully completed in addition to the Series 66 before a candidate can register as a securities agent and investment adviser representative. The composition of the Series 66 Examination was significantly changed. The Series 66 Examination remains comprised of 100 questions; however, the number of questions testing knowledge of Legal and Regulatory Issues has decreased from 80 to 50 and the number of questions testing knowledge of Investment Recommendations, Strategies, and Products has increased from 20 to 50. Additionally, the Examination includes 10 questions which are considered pretest questions, which do not count towards the final grade. Effective January 1, 2010, the passing grade for the Series 66 Examination was increased from 71% to 75%.

House Financial Services Committee Advances Investor Protection Act

noreply@blogger.com (bhill) — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 04:29:00 +0000

Here's our update regarding proposed changes to the regulation of investment advisers.

The Financial Services Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives advanced H.R. 3817, the Investor Protection Act, out of committee yesterday. According to the Financial Services Committee's press release, key provisions of this bill include the following:

an independent study of the regulatory structure for the securities industry;
a doubling of the authorized fund for the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") over five years;
a requirement that every financial imtermediary who provides advice will have a fiduciary duty towards the customer; and
an authorization for the SEC to prohibit mandatory arbitration provisions in customer contracts.

Although there was no reference in the Financial Services Committee's press release concerning the amendment to H.R. 3817 approved last week, which raises assets under management requirement from $25,000,000 to $100,000,000, this amendment will effectively result in many registered investment advisors being regulated at the state instead federal level.

Investment News is reporting that H.R. 3817 advanced out of committee with the controversial amendment that gives Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") regulatory authority over registered investment advisors, which are also dually registered as broker-dealers. According to Investment News, Financial Services Committee Chairman opposes this provision and will offer an amendment during the floor debate to strip out this provision from H.R. 3817.

Once the House releases a mark-up of H.R. 3817 as passed out of committee, RIA Compliance will share with its readers additional details about the proposed legislation.

2010 IARD Renewal & Form ADV Annual Amendment Requirements

noreply@blogger.com (bhill) — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:24:00 +0000

Beginning Monday, November 16, 2009, registered investment advisor firms can access their 2010 Preliminary Renewal Statements via their IARD account. The Preliminary Renewal Statement must be paid, in full, by Friday, December 11, 2009. Because it takes approximately two days for payment to post to the IARD account, the funds should arrive no later than Wednesday, December 09, 2009, to ensure the money is posted to your IARD account by December 11.

RIA Compliance Consultants also wants to remind registered investment advisor firms of their obligation to update Form ADV on at least an annual basis in the form of an Annual Amendment. This is required under U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") Rule 204-1 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and similar rules of state securities regulators. The Form ADV Annual Amendment must be completed within 90 days after a registered investment advisor firm's fiscal year end. Since the majority of investment advisor firms coordinate their fiscal year end with the end of the calendar year, the Form ADV Annual Amendment has become a requirement that must be completed at the beginning of each year for most advisor firms. The main item that must be updated on the Form ADV Annual Amendment is the investment advisor firm's assets under management. Other items such as, but not limited to, the number of accounts, clients, employees, and investment advisor representatives ("IARs") should also be updated. The Form ADV Annual Amendment can also be used to disclose any material changes. Keep in mind, however, that material changes need to be disclosed within 30 days no matter when they take place. Material changes include items such as, but are not limited to, reportable disciplinary and financial disclosures, changes in contact information, changes to custody disclosures and changes due to successions and ownership arrangements.

RIA Compliance Consultants is offering a special package that includes assistance with completing both the annual renewal requirement and filing the Annual Amendment to Form ADV Part 1. For the low price of $450, RIA Compliance Consultants will help your firm confirm its registration status in all necessary jurisdictions and confirm the registration status of all investment advisor representatives for 2010. You will also receive an Annual Amendment Questionnaire for you to complete so that we may prepare and file your Form ADV Part 1 Annual Amendment within the necessary time frame.

Engagements received by RIA Compliance Consultants after November 16 are subject to availability so complete and return the Agreement for Services today! Click below to view the Consulting Agreement for IARD Renewal and Annual Amendment Services.

*If you are an existing hourly retainer client of RIA Compliance Consultants, you do not need to complete the Agreement for Services. Simply contact your lead consultant to sign-up for this service.

**If you are an annual retainer client of RIA Compliance Consultants, this service is included in your retainer agreement. To learn more about our retainer services and fees, please contact us at 877-345-4034.

IARD%20Renewal.Annual%20Amendment.2010.pdf

Deadline Approaching for Investment Advisers to Complete the New Form U4 Regarding Regulatory Actions

noreply@blogger.com (bhill) — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:49:00 +0000

Registered investment adviser firms must file amended Form U4s for all their investment adviser representatives to provide answers to the new regulatory action disclosure questions. The North American Securities Administrators Association ("NASAA") has published notice clarifying that the new questions on the FINRA Form U4 and the deadline of November 13, 2009 applies to investment adviser representatives.

Six regulatory action disclosure questions were added to the Form U4 on May 18, 2009. The new disclosure questions are Questions 14C(6)(7) and (8) and Questions 14E(5)(6) and (7). These questions are recorded with a blank answer on an investment adviser representative’s Form U4 filing, and investment adviser firms must provide answers to these new disclosure questions by not later than November 13, 2009. In order to respond to the new disclosure questions, a firm will need to submit Form U4s with responses to these new questions for all of the firm’s investment adviser representatives. If the firm determines that a “yes” response is required for any of the new disclosure questions, then the U4 filing would need to include a corresponding completed disclosure reporting page regarding the “yes” answer.

For additional details regarding the new Form U4 regulatory action questions, you may review information published on the FINRA website at the Approved Changes to Forms U4 & U5 web page and in the FINRA Regulatory Notice 09-23.

RIA Compliance Consultants, Inc. can help you file updated Form U4s for your investment adviser representatives. If you would like our assistance in updating the Form U4s for your investment adviser representatives, please contact our office at 877-345-4034.

House Financial Services Committee Votes to Raise Assets Under Management for SEC Registration as Investment Adviser from $25 Million to $100 Million

noreply@blogger.com (bhill) — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 01:26:00 +0000

Investment News is reporting that the Financial Services Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives passed today an amendment to the Investor Protection Act, H.R. 3817, whereby the general assets under management requirement to register with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") as an investment adviser would increase from $25 million to $100 million.

This proposed change to the current regulatory structure would make state securities regulators the primary regulator for registered investment advisers with less than one hundred million dollars ($100,000,000) of assets under management (assuming the adviser didn't qualify for exemption to the general AUM requirement). Investment News is also reporting that the Committee passed an amendment to H.R. 3817 authorizing a study of whether investment advisers should be subject to self-regulatory organization.

However, what's unclear is whether the Investor Protection Act, H.R. 3817, has been advanced out of the Financial Services Committee. As of Wednesday evening, it appears the bill is still in mark-up since the website for the Financial Services Committee does not indicate that the Investor Protection Act has been passed by the Committee.

Private Investment Advisers Registration Act is Passed by House Committee on Financial Services

noreply@blogger.com (bhill) — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 03:46:00 +0000

The Financial Services Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R. 3818, the Private Fund Investment Advisers Registration Act, which requires advisers to private funds to register with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").

The Wall Street Journal reported that the Committee agreed that private funds managing less than $150 million would be exempt from the SEC registration requirement. The WSJ noted that small business investment companies ("SBICs") subject to the oversight of the U.S. Small Business Administration along with venture capital fund managers will be exempted from SEC registration. However, it appears that private equity funds and single family offices will be required to register with the SEC in the bill passed by the Financial Services Committee. MarketWatch reported that Rep. Susan Kosmas explained that this bill includes a one-year transition period before registration with the SEC is mandatory for private funds.

The next stop for H.R. 3818 is the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives. RIA Compliance Consultants will continue to keep readers abreast of the status of the bill in the House and its counterpart in the Senate.

Upcoming Webinar: Supervising Gifts & Political Contributions of Investment Adviser Representatives

noreply@blogger.com (bhill) — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:03:00 +0000

Although the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) does not currently have any specific rules associated with the giving or receiving gifts or political contributions by representatives affiliated with a federally registered investment adviser, the influencing of others through gifts and political contributions in the context of an investment advisory relationship creates a potential conflict of interest, which must be addressed and mitigated by an investment adviser.

If you are interested in learning more about recent enforcement actions against investment advisers which lacked safeguards related to gifts and political contributions, please consider purchasing a seat for only $59.95 to our upcoming webinar, “Supervising Gifts and Political Contributions,” on Wednesday, October 28, 2009 from 12:00 – 1:00 p.m.

During this webinar, our speaker, Bryan Hill, will share best practices for supervising gifts and political contributions while reviewing recent SEC enforcement actions against investment advisers, the proposed political contribution rule for investment adviser reps, current rules of FINRA and the U.S. Department of Labor which may apply to some investment adviser representatives and guidance from certain professional accrediting organizations on this subject.

Purchase your webinar seat for $59.95: www.RIA-Compliance-Consultants.com/webinars.

Is Your RIA Supervising the Gifts and Political Contributions of Its Investment Adviser Reps - Learn About the SEC's Proposed Pay-to-Play Rule

noreply@blogger.com (bhill) — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 01:41:00 +0000

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") recently proposed new SEC Rule 206(4)-5 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. According to the SEC, the proposed rule is intended to curtail "pay to play" practices by registered investment advisers that seek to manage money for state and local governments.

This SEC proposal relates to money managed by state and local governments under public programs such as public pension plans for government employees, retirement plans in which teachers and other government employees can invest monies, and 529 plans that allow families to invest money for college. The state and local governments often hire and pay outside registered investment advisers to provide advisory services such as direct investment management or recommendations about which investments to make. The outside registered investment advisers often are selected by one or more trustees who have been appointed by elected officials. The term "pay to play" has been coined because the selection of such trustees can be undermined if elected officials ask investment advisers for political contributions or if elected officials otherwise make it understood that only investment advisers who make contributions will be selected to provide advisory services to the public programs subject to the control of the elected official.

Pay to play practices have been recognized as a significant problem. During the past several years, the SEC has brought enforcement actions in New York, New Mexico, and Connecticut, and likewise, there also have been criminal prosecutions in New York, New Mexico, Illinois, Ohio, Connecticut, and Florida over pay to play schemes.

If you are interested in learning more about recent actions related to registered investment advisers involved in "pay to play" schemes and the SEC's proposed rule to limit "pay to play" practices, please purchase your seat for only $59.95 to our upcoming webinar, "Supervising Gifts and Political Contributions," on Wednesday, October 28, 2009 from 12:00 - 1:00 p.m. CST.

NASAA President Appears on Fox News as an Advocate of Raising the AUM Requirement for SEC Registration as an Investment Adviser

noreply@blogger.com (bhill) — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 20:08:00 +0000

Denise Voigt, the Texas Securities Commissioner and incoming President of the North American Securities Administrators Association ("NASAA"), recently appeared on Fox News to discuss why state securities regulators have the experience and will to take on more regulatory authority with respect to registered investment advisers.

In particular, the Texas Securities Commissioner repeated her previous call for raising the required assets under management from $25 million to $100 million in order to register as an investment adviser with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). She explained that the SEC is overwhelmed, understaffed and lack the will to regulate and protect the smaller investor.

To view a video of Ms. Voigt's appearance on Fox News, you can visit the following page on NASAA's website: http://www.nasaa.org/nasaa_newsroom/11313.cfm.

A Registered Investment Adviser Needs to Ensure that Power of Attorney Over Client's Account Is Limited

noreply@blogger.com (bhill) — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 00:19:00 +0000

In order to trade or otherwise access a client’s account held by a custodian, a registered investment adviser must be granted written authorization by the client. Such authorization is generally granted in the form of a power of attorney. Although a power of attorney over a client’s account is necessary for a registered investment adviser to manage the client's account, it is important for an investment adviser to ensure that the power of attorney is limited to only the functions actually intended by the client and the investment adviser.

Typically, an investment adviser’s limited power of attorney will grant a registered investment adviser the ability to only (1) trade the client’s account; (2) receive statements, confirmations and other documents such as proxies related to the account; and (3) make withdrawals from the account solely for the purpose of deducting the agreed upon investment advisory fees. Any additional authority over a client’s account is generally not needed or wanted by an investment adviser and subjects the investment adviser to additional regulatory scrutiny.

Unfortunately, registered investment advisers are occassionally granted full power of attorney on client accounts, but do not realize the ramifications that results from a full power of attorney. In addition to trading and receiving account documents, full power of attorney allows the investment adviser to transfer money to third parties, change the registration of the account, and completely liquidate and close the account. Under a full power of attorney, this can be done without the client’s consent. A full power of attorney is generally not needed and not desired by an investment adviser. Regardless of whether such authorization is intended or not, the investment adviser with a full power of attorney over a client's account will be deemed by most securities regulators as to have custody over the client account. When a state registered investment adviser is granted full power of attorney, the firm must comply with its state’s often onerous custody requirements. Under such circumstances, the SEC also performs greater scrutiny of custody situations during routine examinations.

Are you certain your firm’s power of attorney is limited to only the authorizations the firm needs to perform its investment advisory functions and does not provide for authorization that the firm does not want or use thus potentially subjecting the firm to needless regulatory requirements and scrutiny?

On October 8, 2009, RIA Compliance Consultants will be presenting its webcast titled “Auditing Investment Advisory Fee Calculations, Deductions and Refunds” during which some attention will be given to an investment adviser’s legal authority to withdraw advisory fees from client accounts and ensuring such authority is limited to only what is necessary. The webcast will also discuss custody ramifications relating to the deduction of advisory fees directly from client accounts.

Join Our Webinar - Auditing Investment Advisory Fee Calculations, Deductions & Refunds

noreply@blogger.com (bhill) — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 20:04:00 +0000

Earlier this year, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") proposed new requirements for registered investment advisor firms that have custody of clients funds and securities. According to current SEC Rule 206(4)-2, Custody or Possession of Funds of Securities of Clients, custody is defined as “holding, directly or indirectly, client funds or securities, or having any authority to obtain possession of them. Custody includes –

(i) Possession of client funds or securities, (but not of checks drawn by clients and made payable to third parties,) unless you receive them inadvertently and you return them to the sender promptly but in any case within three business days of receiving them;

(ii) Any arrangement (including a general power of attorney) under which you are authorized or permitted to withdraw client funds or securities maintained with a custodian upon your instruction to the custodian; and

(iii) Any capacity (such as general partner of a limited partnership, managing member of a limited liability company or a comparable position for another type of pooled investment vehicle, or trustee of a trust) that gives you or your supervised person legal ownership of or access to client funds or securities.

The SEC’s proposed changes to Rule 206(4)-2 do not change the definition of custody or change what is considered custody, but impose additional requirements such as hiring a public accounting firm to perform an annual surprise examination for purpose of verifying client assets. Not surprisingly the proposed rule changes prompted significant discussion and resistance. Most of the investment advisory industry’s resistance has been aimed at the applicability of the audit requirements for the most common form of custody, automatic fee deductions from client accounts. It is estimated by the SEC that a large majority of SEC registered investment advisors automatically deduct their advisory fees from client accounts. The SEC considers this practice to be a type of custody covered under item (ii) above.

Many within the investment advisory industry believe automatic fee deductions pose lower risk than other forms of custody. While this may be true, there are significant risks and potential conflicts associated with automatically deducting advisory fees from client accounts. The fact of the matter is that the SEC and state securities regulators have brought several enforcement actions alleging fraudulent conduct involving the misappropriation and/or misuse of client funds directly related to automatic fee deductions. Fee deduction activities continue to be a focal point during regulatory examinations. Investment advisor firms need to have strong checks and balances to ensure their fee deduction policies and procedures are sufficient. Testing mechanisms need to be reasonably designed and then implemented to prevent, detect and correct errors from occurring during the fee calculation and deduction process. More importantly, supervisory procedures need to protect against fraudulent activity. All registered investment advisor firms need to make sure their compliance procedures go beyond the minimum regulatory requirements of having written client authorization to deduct fees from accounts and ensuring fee calculations appear on client account statements. Procedures need to include ongoing monitoring and auditing of the process.

Some of the more common deficiencies we often note when conducting mock regulatory reviews and annual assessments for our clients include (1) investment advisory fees being deducting from the wrong account; (2) miscalculation of quarterly or monthly investment advisory fees; (3) the agreed upon investment advisory fee between the client and advisor incorrectly entered into the investment advisor’s client database system; (4) the misconception that the client’s qualified custodian is auditing the accuracy of the investment advisor’s investment advisory fee calculations; (5) the investment advisor intentionally or unintentionally overcharging client accounts; and (6) the investment advisor failing to develop procedures to supervise and monitor the investment advisory fee calculation and deduction process.

Does your registered investment advisor firm adequately monitor its fee deduction process? Do you have questions about this important compliance function? If so, join us on Thursday, October 8 at 12:00 p.m. CST for a live webcast titled “Auditing Investment Advisory Fee Calculations, Deductions & Refunds”. During this informative one-hour online event, we will discuss the implications of proposed changes to SEC Rule 206(4)-2, recent regulatory enforcement actions, and best practices with respect to fee calculations, deductions and refunds. The fee to sign up for the webcast is $59.95. You can register now by clicking the link below.

SEC Chair Predicts Detailed Disclosures by Hedge Funds to Regulators

noreply@blogger.com (bhill) — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 02:16:00 +0000

The Wall Street Journal ("WSJ") recently reported that "Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Mary Schapiro predicted that any new regulation of hedge funds will likely require detailed disclosure to regulators, but not necessarily as much disclosure to the public."

According to the WSJ, "[i]f proposed legislation under consideration by Congress to require hedge-fund advisers to register with the SEC is enacted, Ms. Schapiro predicted that the final regulation will result in "fairly detailed reporting to regulators and some level of public reporting to investors."

However, the WSJ noted that Schapiro "...acknowledged that in some instances, such as dealing with hedge funds, it can be hard to strike a balance between informing investors without disclosing too much about firms' trading strategies. She said there are still "issues to be resolved" in this area."

NASAA President Calls for Raising AUM to $100 Million for SEC Registration of Investment Advisers

noreply@blogger.com (bhill) — Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:38:00 +0000

In a recent speech at the North American Securities Administrators Association ("NASAA") annual conference, Texas Securities Commissioner, Denise Voigt Crawford who is the incoming NASAA President, revealed that the SEC might raise the asset under management ("AUM") threshold for SEC registration of investment advisers from $25 million to $100 million, and NASAA supports such a change.

The NASAA President explained that "...the current dividing line between federal and state regulation of investment advisory firms is $25 million of assets under management. The SEC might increase this to $100 million of assets under management. Given the difficulty the SEC has in examining such a large number of investment advisory firms, I think this is a good idea. NASAA has endorsed such a change and will work closely with the SEC to make this happen."

For those smaller SEC registered investment advisers that have voiced concerned about the burden of the proposed SEC rule requiring an annual surprise audit by a public accounting firm, such a change is likely to be well received by many investment advisers, especially since NASAA has indicated that it doesn't believe the surprise audit requirement is necessary for investment advisers deemed to have custody solely due to automatic fee deduction.

NASAA Proposes Model Rule Regarding Solicitors for Registered Investment Advisors

noreply@blogger.com (bhill) — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:48:00 +0000

The Investment Adviser Regulatory Policy and Review Project Group of the North American Securities Administrators Association (known as "NASAA" and essentially consisting of state securities regulators) recently solicited comments from the public on a proposed model rule regarding solicitors for registered investment advisors. The comment period ended in August and NASAA has not yet released a final version of the model rule. According to NASAA’s website, the model rule “is necessary and appropriate to facilitate the regulation of solicitor activity for the benefit of investors, to promote uniformity among the states and between states and federal rules, and to provide guidance to the industry.”

The proposed model rule for solicitor arrangements reaffirms the solicitor/investment advisor written agreement and client disclosure requirements that are already on the books in many states. But the proposed model rule goes further to make very clear that the solicitor must be licensed as an investment advisor representative. While most states require solicitors to license as investment advisor representatives, there is a high level of confusion within the industry regarding solicitor registration and qualifications. Currently, only about 10 states do not require solicitors to license as investment advisors so the model rule includes a provision exempting solicitors from the investment advisor representative licensing requirements for states that choose to do so. The model rule is designed to mirror Rule 206(4)-3 of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") provisions for statutory disqualifications, written agreements and disclosures to clients.

NASAA’s proposed rules are being provided under the Uniform Securities Act of 1956 and under the Uniform Securities Act of 2002. Therefore it is important to note that just because NASAA adopts a new model rule, it does not mean every state will automatically adopt the rule. While many states strictly follow the Uniform Securities Act’s provisions for investment advisors, some do not. Also, the adoption of any new rule must be made by the individual state. For example, in some states the securities division is given more latitude to implement new rules while other states securities division may require specific authorization from the state legislature. You can read more about the proposed rule on the NASAA website.

To learn information about the regulatory requirements for investment advisor solicitor arrangements, you can purchase our webinar, “Establishing & Supervising Solicitor Arrangements," recorded on August 19, 2009 and view on-demand for a purchase price of $59.95. During this webinar, our consultants review in detail the requirements of SEC Rule 206(4)-3, the registration requirements of certain states and best supervisory practices for an investment adviser utilizing solicitors.

Purchase this on-demand webinar, “Establishing & Supervising Solicitor Arrangements," for $59.95 by clicking below.

Registered Investment Advisors Need to Monitor Outside Business Activities of Investment Advisor Representatives

noreply@blogger.com (bhill) — Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:17:00 +0000

The establishment of policies and procedures designed to monitor the outside business activities ("OBAs") of supervised persons (i.e. officers, directors, partners, investment advisor representatives, and employees) should be part of every registered investment advisor firm's written compliance programs. RIA Compliance Consultants, Inc. suggests that some type of "outside business activities form" be created and all supervised persons be required to complete the form on an annual basis and whenever changes are needed. A supervised person should disclose and seek approval of an outside business activity prior to engaging in the activity.

There are two important regulatory reasons for monitoring outside business activities: (a) Form ADV disclosure purposes, and (b) Form U4 disclosure purposes. A registered investment advisor is required to disclose to clients all potential and real conflicts of interests including outside activities of the firm and its related persons. Item 8 of Form ADV Part II outlines specific business activities or affiliations of the firm's related persons that must be disclosed. These include affiliations with institutions such as banks, real estate brokers, and broker/dealers. Individuals listed under Item 6 of Form ADV Part II need to provide detailed business background for the preceding five years. Finally, Item 7.C. of the Form ADV Part II may require the registered investment advisor firm to provide a description of the supervised person's outside activity and the amount of time spent on that activity.

In addition to disclosing outside activities on the Form ADV, investment advisor representatives ("IARs") must disclose their employment history for the previous 10 years and their current outside business activity on the Form U4. It is the investment advisor representative's ultimate responsibility to keep the Form U4 current and complete, particularly his/her employment and other business background.

Registered investment advisors need to be cognizant of the 30 day deadline for making material updates to the Form ADV and Form U4. Whenever an individual or firm's outside business activities change, those activities need to be updated on the Form ADV and/or Form U4 within 30 days of the change.

Jarrod James, Vice President of RIA Compliance Consultants, will be the featured speaker during our webinar, "Addressing Outside Business Activities and Conflicts of Interest," on Tuesday, September 15, 2009 from 12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. CST.

Purchase your webinar seat for $59.95:
www.RIA-Compliance-Consultants.com/webinars.

RIAs Required to Disclose Conflicts of Interest & Outside Business Activities

noreply@blogger.com (bhill) — Mon, 07 Sep 2009 20:30:00 +0000

A registered investment advisor has a fiduciary duty to disclose all real and potential conflicts of interests to clients as well as all material arrangements. Often times this broad requirement encompasses outside business activities the registered investment advisor considers non-advisory and would otherwise not disclose to clients. For example, a registered investment advisor that spends only 10% of its time on investment advisory activities and 90% of its time on non-advisory activities is required to disclose this fact. It must be made clear to all clients that the registered investment advisor will not devote all of its time to investment advisory functions unlike other registered investment advisor firms whose only activity is acting as an investment advisor.

An outside business activity may create an incentive to the registered investment advisor that is not in the best interests of the client. For example, an investment advisor representative that is also an insurance agent may decide to recommend a particular insurance product based on an incentive to sell the product (e.g. higher commission, soft-dollars, trips, marketing allowance) rather than recommending the product solely based on the needs of the client. This is a classic conflict of interest that must be disclosed to investment advisory clients. A registered investment advisor’s failure to disclose outside business activities and the outside business activities of its supervised persons is an all-too-often deficiency during examinations by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and state securities regulators.

A related type of deficiency is the failure to adequately monitor and approve outside business activities considered investment related. Certain financial related activities are considered higher risk for conflicts of interest between an investment advisor representative ("IAR") and his/her clients and even his/her firm. These activities include wholesaling investment products, affiliation with a broker/dealer, acting as a mortgage broker, working for a second registered investment advisor, and serving as a limited partner or managing member of a private investment. Before a registered investment advisor allows its supervised persons (which includes all officers, directors, partners, investment advisor representatives and employees) to engage in these types of activities, it is imperative that the supervised person fully disclose the activity and provide detailed documentation of how the activity will impact their affiliation with the registered investment advisor. If the activity does not comply with the registered investment advisor’s compliance policies and procedures, the registered investment advisor should not approve the activity.

For more information and guidance regarding outside business activities common to many registered investment advisors and to learn some best practices with respect to disclosure and mitigation of conflicts of interest, please consider attending our webinar, “Addressing Outside Business Activities and Conflicts of Interest,” on Tuesday, September 15, 2009 from 12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. CST.

Purchase your webinar seat for $59.95 at www.RIA-Compliance-Consultants.com/webinars.

Upcoming Webinar Addressing Succession Planning for RIAs

noreply@blogger.com (bhill) — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 02:40:00 +0000

Many individuals who operate their own registered investment adviser firms have a tendency to delay succession planning and deal almost exclusively with shorter-term business issues. However, succession planning is a critical issue, in particular, for a small registered investment adviser firm due to the risks that one key investment adviser representative could become unavailable, on either a temporary or permanent basis, to serve clients and operate the registered investment adviser firm. In the interest of both the investment advisory practice and its clients, it is critical to plan for continuity and succession of the registered investment adviser firm.

Ideally, a registered investment adviser's business succession plan should be in place well in advance of any investment adviser representative's planned or unplanned departure from the investment advisory practice. There are several components that comprise a successful succession plan, such as: (a) creating an ideal scenario for departure of the investment adviser representative; (b) identifying and evaluating potential buyers or other successors; (c) deciding how the registered investment adviser firm's responsibilities will be distributed to the successors; (d) if necessary, determining who will mentor the successors; (e) determining the value of your registered investment adviser firm; and (f) addressing tax implications of the succession and implementing strategies to reduce taxes.

Particularly, with respect to creating an ideal scenario for planned or unplanned departure of any investment adviser representative and in determining the value of your registered investment adviser firm, it is critical to be aware of financial industry regulations and requirements affecting a registered investment adviser. These include FINRA's Continuing Commissions policy and corresponding SEC guidance regarding continuing commissions for registered representatives of a broker-dealer; the privacy policies of relinquishing and receiving firms and custodians if the succession plan will involve a change of the actual investment adviser firm entity or the custodian for client accounts; licensing and registration requirements for the investment adviser firm and any affiliated investment advisory representatives; assignment provisions of the Investment Advisers Act, restrictive covenants, such as non-solicitation or non-compete agreements, affecting the investment adviser representative and/or intended successors; and continuity of existing business contracts.

For more information and guidance about the regulatory considerations when planning for succession within your registered investment adviser, purchase a webinar seat for "Planning for Succession" sponsored by RIA Compliance Consultants and presented by our affiliated law firm, Bryan Hill Attorney at Law, on Tuesday, September 8, 2009 from 12:00 -1:00 p.m. Central Standard Time. The charge for this webinar is $59.95.

Purchase for $59.95 your webinar seat now: www.RIA-Compliance-Consultants.com/webinars

Federal Credit Union Must Utilize CUSO to Register as Investment Adviser

noreply@blogger.com (bhill) — Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:29:00 +0000

Recently the National Credit Union Administration (“NCUA”) has issued guidance regarding the offer of investment advisory services by federal credit unions. Specifically, the NCUA has stated that the employee of a federal credit union may not provide investment advisory services that would subject that employee or the federal credit union to federal or state securities laws, and has noted that the regulation and oversight of investment advisory services is conducted by the SEC, and by the states, pursuant to the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

The NCUA has stated that there is no authority under the Federal Credit Union Act for federal credit unions to act as registered investment advisers to provide investment advice. The NCUA has indicated that federal credit union employees may conduct activities that it considers financial counseling but are not permitted to offer investment advisory services. The NCUA provided some specific guidance explaining its distinction between “financial counseling” and investment advice. In its May 2003 Letter (OGC Op 03-0308 (May 1, 2003)), the NCUA references the preamble to NCUA’s incidental powers rule, which had the following explanation with respect to the permissible activity of financial counseling:

…[federal credit unions] may counsel members about financial matters, such as setting budgets, establishing financial goals, and managing tax liabilities. Other examples within this category may include counseling members on money management, paying down debt, saving for the future, types of investments, and diversification principles. This category applies only to financial counseling provided by a [federal credit union] to its members and does not encompass activities that require SEC registration as a broker, dealer or investment adviser.

In its June 2009 Legal Opinion Letter 09-0511 Investment Advice Services, the NCUA stated that a credit union may offer investment advisory services to its members in three ways: 1) through a shared employee with a registered investment adviser; 2) by acting as a finder under the NCUA incidental powers rule; or 3) by wholly or partly owning a Credit Union Service Organization (“CUSO”) that provides investment advisory services. Acting as a finder is otherwise known as acting as a solicitor to a Registered Investment Adviser. If acting as a solicitor, a credit union will need to be compliant with the applicable regulatory requirements for solicitors, including SEC Rule 206(4)-3, and any applicable state registration requirements. Most states define the solicitation or referral of investment advisory clients as an investment advisory activity which requires the registration of the solicitor as a registered investment adviser or investment adviser representative. A CUSO that provides investment advisory services would need to be properly registered as a registered investment adviser.

If you are affiliated with a federal credit union and have questions related to registration or regulation of registered investment advisers, RIA Compliance Consultants, Inc. can help. We can provide you with guidance about the activities of providing of investment advice through an arrangement with an existing registered investment adviser, acting as a solicitor to a registered investment adviser, or offering investment advisory services through a CUSO.

Licensing of Solicitors as Investment Advisor Representatives Required by Most State Securities Regulators

noreply@blogger.com (bhill) — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:25:00 +0000

Did you know that most state securities regulators require paid solicitors of registered investment advisor firms to license as investment advisor representatives? This means that the solicitor must either establish his/her own registered investment advisor or license under an existing registered investment advisor. From the solicitor's perspective it is far easier to simply license under an existing registered investment advisor rather than forming a new registered investment advisor. However, what does that mean for the existing registered investment advisor holding the solicitor's investment advisor representative license?

When a solicitor is licensed as an investment advisor representative under a registered investment advisor, the registered investment advisor becomes much more responsible for the investment advisory activities of the solicitor. The relationship moves away from a due diligence requirement to a supervision requirement. A registered investment advisor must treat all licensed investment advisor representatives, even those that are just solicitors, as supervised persons for purposes of the firm's compliance policies and procedures and code of ethics. Therefore, in addition to ensuring compliance with the SEC's solicitor rule, the solicitor must follow the firm's written compliance policies and procedures including the firm's code of ethics. The registered investment advisor must establish reasonable policies and procedures designed to properly supervise its licensed solicitors. These procedures could include training events, advertising limitations, and monitoring the actual services provided by the solicitor.

If your firm has an active solicitor program, is considering such a program or if you just want to learn more about SEC Rule 206(4)-3, please join us for our August 19 webinar titled "Establishing & Supervising Solicitor Arrangements". This timely webinar is being presented by Jarrod James, Vice President and Senior Compliance Consultant at RIA Compliance Consultants, Inc. The cost of the webinar is $59.95 and will detail the requirements of Rule 206(4)-3, discuss best tips for complying with the rule and provide opportunity for attendees to pose specific questions. We will be examining the differences between affiliated and unaffiliated solicitors and the ramifications of holding licenses of solicitor-only investment advisor representatives.

Purchase your webinar seat now: https://www2.gotomeeting.com/register/673425275

*The webinar has been accepted by the CFP Board for 1 hour of General CFP® continuing education credit.