SEC Releases Interpretation on Soft-Dollars
Late last month, the SEC issued its most recent interpretation concerning Section 28(e) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, which is better known as the soft dollar safe harbor. The SEC is also soliciting further comments on Section 28(e). As the interpretation released by the SEC points out, soft dollar arrangements have historically been, and will continue to be, a hot topic with regulators. Soft dollar arrangements are viewed as arrangements under which products or services other than execution of securities transactions are obtained by an advisor from or through a broker/dealer in exchange for the direction of client brokerage transactions to the broker/dealer.
There are two types of soft dollar arrangements, those that fall under the Section 28(e) safe harbor and those that fall outside of the safe harbor.
Under Section 28(e), advisors, exercising investment discretion over an account, that receive services and products falling under the safe harbor shall not be deemed to have acted unlawfully or to have breached their fiduciary duty because the use of the services causes an account to pay more than the lowest available commission. However, the advisor must determine, in good faith, that the amount of the commission is reasonable in relation to the brokerage and research services provided. The SEC’s interpretive release provides guidance in this area and states the safe harbor provisions apply to arrangements that (1) pass an application of eligibility criteria; (2)that the advisor’s lawful and appropriate use of the items; and (3) the advisor’s good-faith determination that the commissions paid are reasonable in light of the value of the services received. While arrangements that fall under the safe harbor are protected, they must still be fully disclosed in the firm’s Form ADV or similar disclosure brochure.
Soft dollar arrangements that fall outside the safe harbor are not prohibited; however, they will come under greater scrutiny from regulators and clients. Therefore, it is even more important to fully disclose these types of arrangements in the firm’s Form ADV or similar disclosure brochure. Answers to questions such as what are the arrangements, when do they occur, why are they received, and what are the results of receiving such services and/or products should be disclosed to clients in the Form ADV or disclosure brochure.
All advisor firms need to identify soft dollar arrangements and make sure such arrangements are fully disclosed in their Form ADV. While the Form ADV does not have a specific question regarding soft dollars, regulators expect to see disclosure to Items 12 and 13 of Form ADV Part II on the Schedule F.
Has your firm properly disclosed its soft dollar arrangements? Has your firm even identified all soft dollar situations especially those that fall outside Section 28(e)? If you have questions concerning soft dollar arrangements, would like to discuss the SEC’s interpretation further, or would like to discuss any other conflicts of interest please give us a call.
There are two types of soft dollar arrangements, those that fall under the Section 28(e) safe harbor and those that fall outside of the safe harbor.
Under Section 28(e), advisors, exercising investment discretion over an account, that receive services and products falling under the safe harbor shall not be deemed to have acted unlawfully or to have breached their fiduciary duty because the use of the services causes an account to pay more than the lowest available commission. However, the advisor must determine, in good faith, that the amount of the commission is reasonable in relation to the brokerage and research services provided. The SEC’s interpretive release provides guidance in this area and states the safe harbor provisions apply to arrangements that (1) pass an application of eligibility criteria; (2)that the advisor’s lawful and appropriate use of the items; and (3) the advisor’s good-faith determination that the commissions paid are reasonable in light of the value of the services received. While arrangements that fall under the safe harbor are protected, they must still be fully disclosed in the firm’s Form ADV or similar disclosure brochure.
Soft dollar arrangements that fall outside the safe harbor are not prohibited; however, they will come under greater scrutiny from regulators and clients. Therefore, it is even more important to fully disclose these types of arrangements in the firm’s Form ADV or similar disclosure brochure. Answers to questions such as what are the arrangements, when do they occur, why are they received, and what are the results of receiving such services and/or products should be disclosed to clients in the Form ADV or disclosure brochure.
All advisor firms need to identify soft dollar arrangements and make sure such arrangements are fully disclosed in their Form ADV. While the Form ADV does not have a specific question regarding soft dollars, regulators expect to see disclosure to Items 12 and 13 of Form ADV Part II on the Schedule F.
Has your firm properly disclosed its soft dollar arrangements? Has your firm even identified all soft dollar situations especially those that fall outside Section 28(e)? If you have questions concerning soft dollar arrangements, would like to discuss the SEC’s interpretation further, or would like to discuss any other conflicts of interest please give us a call.
Labels: Soft Dollars
posted by bhill at 10:59 AM
SEC Chairman Issues Press Release Concerning Goldstein v. SEC
On August 7, SEC Chairman Christopher Cox issued a press release concerning the recent D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals decision in SEC v. Goldstein. In the release, Cox stated that the SEC does not intend to fight the recent decision of the Court which threw out the controversial hedge fund advisor registration rule that was effective earlier this year. This decision by the SEC effectively ends the most current debate of whether advisors to hedge funds fall under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. However, while this current battle appears over, the issue is not.
In the same press release, Cox stated that he has instructed the SEC to continue looking at ways to monitor hedge funds and those persons that advise hedge funds. The SEC is looking at methods to bring hedge funds under the anti-fraud provisions of the Advisers Act in a way that would pass legal scrutiny. He said possible changes “would have the effect of 'looking through' a hedge fund to its investors. This would reverse the side-effect of the Goldstein decision that the anti-fraud provisions of the Act apply only to 'clients' as the court interpreted that term, and not to investors in the hedge fund.” Finally, Cox made an effort to remind the industry that while Goldstein may have thrown out the registration rule, hedge funds are still “subject to SEC regulations and enforcement under the antifraud, civil liability, and other provisions of the federal securities laws.”
To read the entire text of the press release click here
The debate over hedge fund regulation appears far from over. If you are an advisor to a hedge fund and have questions concerning these recent developments or just have general questions concerning the regulation of investment advisors, please give us a call.
In the same press release, Cox stated that he has instructed the SEC to continue looking at ways to monitor hedge funds and those persons that advise hedge funds. The SEC is looking at methods to bring hedge funds under the anti-fraud provisions of the Advisers Act in a way that would pass legal scrutiny. He said possible changes “would have the effect of 'looking through' a hedge fund to its investors. This would reverse the side-effect of the Goldstein decision that the anti-fraud provisions of the Act apply only to 'clients' as the court interpreted that term, and not to investors in the hedge fund.” Finally, Cox made an effort to remind the industry that while Goldstein may have thrown out the registration rule, hedge funds are still “subject to SEC regulations and enforcement under the antifraud, civil liability, and other provisions of the federal securities laws.”
To read the entire text of the press release click here
The debate over hedge fund regulation appears far from over. If you are an advisor to a hedge fund and have questions concerning these recent developments or just have general questions concerning the regulation of investment advisors, please give us a call.
Labels: SEC
posted by bhill at 10:54 AM
