RIA Compliance Consultants
Blog
Blog
Tuesday, September 11, 2007

Results from SEC's Inspection of "Free Lunch" Seminars

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), North American Securities Administrators Association ("NASAA") and Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") released the findings from their recent joint inspection of "free lunch" seminars targeted at seniors.

Based on the findings by these securities regulators, there are several valuable lessons for those financial professionals that are currently conducting "free lunch" seminars.
  1. Do not offer door prizes or other prizes to attendees of the "free lunch" seminar.
  2. Do not describe the "free lunch" seminar as "educational" or "nothing will be sold" in the advertising materials.
  3. Do not use testimonials of clients in seminars or advertising for the seminars.
  4. Do not make exaggerated, unwarranted or misleading statements about safety, liquidity or rates of return such as "Immediately add $100,000 to your net worth," "How to receive a 13.3% return," and "How $100K can pay 1 Million Dollars to Your Heirs."
  5. Ensure that descriptions of the financial adviser's expertise can be quantified and documented and are not misleading. Avoid using professional designation implying expertise with seniors.
  6. Disclose specific product manufacturer's name if such company is paying for the "free lunch" seminar. Explain that this creates a potential conflict of interest.
  7. Do not double bill two different product manufacturers for the same "free lunch" seminar.
  8. Obtain the advance approval of the seminar script and advertising material by the financial professional's broker-dealer and/or investment advisor before use.
  9. Fully disclose the risks associated with a particular product and do not over state the benefits.

It's clear from this report that "free lunch" seminars and the financial professionals engaging in such activities will be under intense scrutiny by the securities regulators. Consequently, it might be prudent to consider whether the regulatory risks justify this marketing technique.



| More

posted by bhill at 10:22 PM

 

 

Subscribe to this Feed

Recent Posts
SEC Chair Previews Results of "Free Lunch" Seminar...
New Hampshire Waives the Series 65 Exam Requiremen...
Senate Hearing Scheduled Regarding “Free Lunch” Se...
California Proposes Amendments to Rules under the ...
Attention Investment Advisers Registered in Illino...
Adoption of Rule 206(4)-8
SEC Initiates Cease-and-Desist Proceeding over Reg...
SEC Files Enforcement Action Against Investment Ad...
SEC Settles a Form 13F Filing Violation for a $100...
Washington Securities Division is Scrutinizing Pro...

Subjects
ADV Part 2
Advertising
Annual Amendment
Arbitration
Assignment
Best Execution
Books Records
CFP
Code Of Ethics
Compliance Program
Compliance Training
Compliance Violations
Conflict Of Interest
Credit Union
Custody
Customer Complaint
Enforcement
Equity-Indexed Annuities
Fee Audit
Fiduciary
Financial Statements
Form 13F
Form ADV
Form U4
Gifts
Hedge Funds
IAR Licensing
IARD
Insider Trading
Inv Adv Rep
Outside Business Activities
PST
Pensions
Political Contributions
Pooled Investment Vehicle
Power Of Attorney
Privacy
Proxy Voting
REg
Record Keeping
Registration
Regulatory Inspections
Renewals
SAS 70 Audit Report
SEC Inspection
SEC
SRO
Schedule 13G
Series 65
Short Sales
Soft Dollars
Solicitors
Succession Planning
Third-Party Compliance Audit
Trade Allocation
Webinar